User blogs

It is possible to customize the pandora charms black friday charms depending on your dress for almost any function or even your mood with a particular day! On top of this, these bracelets may always be gifted to anybody at almost any occasion like anniversary, birthday or graduation day. It can be certain that anyone who receives these bracelets would certainly surely adore your method. In fact, these charms are more and more being presented as gifts to women who have just graduated from other schools.
pandora charms black friday sale uk jewelry is accessible at an inexpensive price. In this method, Pandora helps you wear the jewelry of one's family choice at a much lesser price when compared with traditional jewelry. It's also possible going for adding precious gems like diamonds only when allowed by the pocket to complete so.
Cleaning your pandora charms black friday deals bracelets is instead uncomplicated. Whatever you severely have to have is lukewarm water and soap as well as a toothbrush. Gently scrub diamonds jewelry after which you can rinse in obvious water. to be able to eliminate the tougher caked-on dirt soak for approximately 10 minutes preceding to suit your needs gently scrub. For virtually any shinier surface, consult smoking the product sales acquaintances at Wilkins and Olander. we're qualified to arrange for a washing at our store. You can even polish your expensive jewelry which has a specific polishing pandora bracelets sale cloth which includes a special cleanup solution. This special cleanup cloth and options around at Wilkins and Olander. very much alike a warning, please don't brandish any pandora charms sale clearance deals charms to chemicals. The sterling silver charms manifest their depth by oxidation. And then for virtually every publicity to specific compounds may alter your piece of jewelry. a number of these chemicals include the types contained in warm tubs, spas and pools. fluid silver polish is one more example.
Known for their cheap air max 90 cushioning and quality involving letting the feet respire, the Air Max shoes from Nike is a favorite with athletes along with all sports enthusiasts. If you think you need to buy cheap Nike Surroundings Max shoes but tend to be still hesitating, read on to discover more about them and why these are praised so much. It will actually give you confidence when walking to any kind of shoe shop.
New versions of air nike air max trainers cheap series are frequently introduced by Nike pretty. Using each new version, the shoe is definitely good. Most users rate them as being superbly comfortable, even for any with wider feet. They are meant to be worn during rigorous sports activity, and are well-ventilated. A look with the shoe, with its mesh material, will let you are aware of that they will not let your feet get unpleasantly warm as well as sweaty. This is definitely something one actively seeks in a sports footwear.
Going beyond comfort, they're just well-designed and made with thought. This is something clear in how they allow you to in performing your ideal. The grip or traction of this shoe is rated well by most of users.
The adidas trainers cheap and the design of your shoe sole works well on all surfaces. In many weathers, you will find you could move really well in them. It is easy to change directions while required during play, and they are not slippery at all.
Their converse jack purcell uk is also something that those in the sports field have reacted well to. They are not overly light or the very lightest shoes you are able to find available in the market, but just the excess weight that feels supportive as well as dependable enough. This means that your feet will not tire too early. The shoe provides firmness and goes well by using most arches.
skychens Yesterday, 03:14 · Tags: converse jack purcell uk
The Pandora charms sale bracelets are the base from the Pandora charm bracelets that every person is mad about. They are the basis in the form of the attraction wristlet. Pandora has numerous varied styles to select from for the bracelet. Web site of choices Pandora includes presented. Pandora bracelets come in many assorted materials. Gold, Silver and leather include the major materials you can decide upon. Cotton strings with metal locks are too available, but are not as admired as the household leather and metal bracelets models. To have a not one but two color bracelet is as well an alternate. The bracelet may just be one fabric, and the clasp might be of a varied material. There is a moldy silver style that has an gold tie up.
The leather matter bracelets come in a good number of varied colors and they've an inclination to have silver clinches. When looking for the bracelet material, understand that the best part of it that finally it would be covered with pandora peacock charms charms. These jewels pull inside sizes from nine ins to six inches bear in mind that one will have need of odds of piece to accommodate to the beads that will be added to the wristlet. The rule is that one should can easily place the pointer finger one of many bracelet and the wrist. If it isn't certain about the length, let the Pandora retailer decide on to certify a person receive the idyllic fit.
The tie up is often a tremendously vital part with the entire bracelet. There are generally two vital clinch styles for green bay packer pandora charms bracelets, in a snap and the lobster claw. Your lobster claw is relatively more conventional, and is extremely potent and straightforward to utilize. The snap clinch looks parallel to some droplet, and is probably the most renowned choice for Pandora necklaces. The snap clinches usually are enormously harmless, and probable to add up in with the remaining beads on the wristlet. Both clinch forms are available in both authentic silver as well as gold. The metal Pandora bracelets are separated. Diminutive thread divides the wristlet throughout three sections. This keeps the drops in sliding shape roughly across the wristlet.
If the bracelet is not really filled with beads until now the pandora travel charms allow the beads which are on the bracelet to hang about for their individual section and usually do not muddle up in one fraction about the bracelet. The trinkets and beads could possibly be warped over the sections, letting them to often be place in any arrangement somebody like. The leather material bracelets tend not to come with segments. The stimulating element for the subject of these bracelets is in search of bright new charms! Pandora bracelets are too could be splendid treats.

A Response to Jamaat al Muslimeen on Syria


Every now again something is brought to my attention that I as a Muslim must speak on, and on this evening of the beginning of the Passover feast which is dedicated to Allah removing Israel from bondage, I'm moved to speak out on this.


A link to the New Trend Magazine edited by Dr. Kaukab Siddique, who is also the Ameer of Jamaat al Muslimeen, and Masjid Jamaat al Muslimeen was posted to my timeline, which contained an article entitled:


"Jamaat al-Muslimeen Supports strike on Assad's air base but one shot will not do it"


Dr. Siddique begins his article with a supplication praising Allah for "...Assad getting some of his own medicine" and praising Donald Trump for his "Great work" and exclaiming "Do it again Mr. Trump!". He goes on in this brief article to label Assad "The Devil in Damascus" and makes the claim that he has murdered a quarter million civilians.

Dr, Siddique goes on to list  the ..".united forces of Alawites, Iran, , Russians, Shias and hizb ush shaitan" as against the "Muslims".

Dr. Siddique knows or should know that the majority of the people of Syria are of the Sunni sect to which he belongs, he knows or should know that the majority of the Syrian Army is comprised of Sunnis, and that the Shia and Allawites are actually a minority in the Syrian Army and government.

Dr. Siddique knows or should know that the Iranians, who he once enjoyed cordial relations with the government of Ayatollah Khomeini during the days of the "Iranian Revolution", and that Iran has been a faithful and ardent supporter of the liberation of Palestine.

Irrespective of the aforementioned facts, Dr. Siddique is a scholar of Al Qur'an, an Imam, and the Ameer of a Muslim community that proclaims to adhere to the following  Al Qur'an, and "Authentic Hadith"

It appears to that none of this seems to matter to Dr. Siddique when it comes to the NATO backed groups who are murdering  the people of Syria, maybe it's because of his support of the Muslim Brotherhood who for 40 or more years wanted to destroy the secular governments of  so-called Arab countries, but to be honest, this is purely speculation on my part.

What concerns me is that Dr. Siddique has called for the removal of Gadhafi in Libya and supported the same ISIS groups that have destroyed Libya for NATO and Israel irrespective of the fact that the Muslim Brotherhood of Syria, Jabhat Fateh al-Sham, Jaysh al-Sunna, and others are all armed by the US/NATO/Israel/ Saudi Alliance.

It has taken me two days to get through this because I didn't want to allow my  very sordid personal relationship with Dr, Siddique to interfere with my objectivity regarding this matter, and it is only through the grace of Allah that the events of today April 13, 2017 has confirmed what I had already written to Dr. Siddique on a medium he controls that has been erased, nonetheless,  time has proven the point I'm making.

Today, April 13, 2017 President Trump heard Dr. Siddique and granted him his wish to "Do it again Mr. Trump!" but he didn't drop a 22,000 pound Lithium laced bomb in Syria on the Shia and Alawite Muslims that Dr. Siddique hates, today President Trump waged chemical warfare on Afghanistan, purportedly against ISIS----I guess we should be careful what we wish for. Dr. Siddique took sides with an oppressor government against Muslims who use an identical Qur'an.

And this is the problem with Dr. Siddique's position of begging Mr. Trump to kill one side of a Muslim conflict against another and aligning himself with the enemies of Allah and Muslims irrespective of their sectarian differences.


وَمَا‌ ك‍‍َ‍انَ لِمُؤْمِنٍ

‌أَ‌نْ يَ‍‍‍قْ‍‍‍تُلَ مُؤْمِنا‌‌ ً‌ ‌إِلاَّ‌ خَ‍‍‍طَ‍‍أ‌ ً‌ ۚوَمَ‍‌‍نْقَ‍‍تَلَمُؤْمِناًخَ‍‍‍طَ‍‍أ‌‌ًفَتَحْ‍‍ر‍ِ‍ي‍‍رُ‌‌‍رَقَ‍‍بَةٍمُؤْمِنَةٍوَدِيَةٌمُسَلَّمَة‌‍ٌ‌‌إِلَ‍‍ىأَهْلِهِإِلاَّأَنْيَ‍‍صَّ‍‍دَّ‍‍قُ‍‍و‌ا‌ۚفَإِ‌نْك‍‍َ‍انَمِ‍‌‍نْقَ‍‍‍وْمٍعَدُ‌وّ‌ٍ‌لَكُمْوَهُوَمُؤْمِن‌‍ٌ‌فَتَحْ‍‍ر‍ِ‍ي‍‍رُ‌‌‍رَقَ‍‍بَةٍمُؤْمِنَةٍۖوَإِنْك‍‍َ‍انَمِ‍‌‍نْقَ‍‍‍وْمٍبَيْنَكُمْوَبَيْنَهُمْمِيث‍‍َ‍اق‌‍ٌ‌فَدِيَةٌمُسَلَّمَة‌‍ٌ‌‌إِلَ‍‍ىأَهْلِ‍‍هِوَتَحْ‍‍رِي‍‍رُ‌‍رَقَ‍‍بَةٍمُؤْمِنَة‌‍ٍ‌ۖفَمَ‍‌‍نْلَمْيَجِ‍‍دْ‌فَ‍‍صِ‍‍ي‍‍َ‍امُشَهْ‍رَيْ‍‍نِمُتَتَابِعَ‍‍يْ‍‍نِتَوْبَةًمِنَاللَّ‍‍هِۗوَك‍‍َانَاللَّ‍‍هُعَلِيماًحَكِيماً


Wa Mā Kāna Limu'uminin 'An Yaqtula Mu'umināan 'Illā Khaţa'anۚWa Man Qatala Mu'umināan Khaţa'an Fataĥrīru Raqabatin Mu'uminatin Wa Diyatun Musallamatun 'Ilá 'Ahlihi~ 'Illā 'An YaşşaddaqūۚFa'in Kāna Min Qawmin `Adūwin Lakum Wa Huwa Mu'uminun Fataĥrīru Raqabatin Mu'uminatinۖWa 'In Kāna Min Qawmin Baynakum Wa Baynahum Mīthāqun Fadiyatun Musallamatun 'Ilá 'Ahlihi Wa Taĥrīru Raqabatin Mu'uminatinۖFaman Lam Yajid Faşiyāmu Shahrayni Mutatābi`ayni Tawbatan Mina AllāhiۗWa Kāna Allāhu `Alīmāan Ĥakīmāan


It is not for a believer to kill a believer unless (it be) by mistake. He who hath killed a believer by mistake must set free a believing slave, and pay the blood-money to the family of the slain, unless they remit it as a charity. If he (the victim) be of a people hostile unto you, and he is a believer, then (the penance is) to set free a believing slave. And if he cometh of a folk between whom and you there is a covenant, then the blood-money must be paid unto his folk and (also) a believing slave must be set free. And whoso hath not the wherewithal must fast two consecutive months. A penance from Allah. Allah is Knower, Wise.---- Suratul An Nisa (4:92)


How does one praise Allah and cheer on an oppressor in killing Muslims, but yet call for peace when the same oppressors are killing Muslims here in the United States.

It is no mistake that Dr. Siddique essentially and seemingly most gleefully begged the head of the "Great Satan" to "Do it again Mr. Trump!". It is no mistaking that he has aligned himself with Satan against Shia and Alawites who pronounce La ilaha ila Allah, just like he does.

But Al Qur'an goes further with respect to a Muslim killing another Muslim on purpose:

وَمَ‍‌‍نْ يَ‍‍‍قْ‍‍‍تُلْ مُؤْمِنا‌ ً‌ مُتَعَ‍‍مِّ‍‍د‌ا‌‌ ً‌ فَجَز‍َ‍‌ا‌ؤُهُ جَهَ‍‍نَّ‍‍مُ خَ‍‍الِد‌ا‌‌ ً‌ فِيهَا‌ ‌وَ‍‍غَ‍‍‍ضِ‍‍بَ ‌اللَّ‍‍هُ عَلَ‍‍يْ‍‍هِ ‌وَلَعَنَ‍‍هُ ‌وَ‌أَعَدَّ‌ لَ‍‍هُ عَذَ‌اباً‌ عَ‍‍ظِ‍‍يماً              

Wa Man Yaqtul Mu'umināan Muta`ammidāan Fajazā'uuhu Jahannamu Khālidāan Fīhā Wa Ghađiba Allāhu `Alayhi Wa La`anahu Wa 'A`adda Lahu `Adhābāan `Ažīmāan


Whoso slayeth a believer of set purpose, his reward is hell for ever. Allah is wroth against him and He hath cursed him and prepared for him an awful doom. ----Suratul An Nisa (4: 93)

So here we have Dr. Siddique, who is a Muslim, shamelessly begging a polytheistic oppressor to bomb other Muslims, because they aren't from his particular sect, when there aren't supposed to be any sects in Al Islam according to Al Qur'an---and gleefully begging him to "Do it again Mr. Trump!".

This is of concern to me in that Dr. Siddique, and Jamaat al Muslimeen, purport to defend the right of oppressed people, with a special emphasis on Black people and so-called African-Americans, who are being oppressed right here in the United States, by the very government he is begging to bomb Muslims.

He claims to fight for the rights of Imam Jamil al Amin (H. Rap Brown), who is serving a sentence in a United States federal prison, he says that Muslims in the United States must find a "non-violent" means of resistance, and he states at the New Trend Magazine website, "OUR PURPOSE  Bring up the Oppressed (Mustadafeen) Bring down the Oppressor (mufsideen), but he cheers on an oppressor in his wicked oppression based on sectarian differences.

My people are oppressed and suffer daily from a structurally racist system of government and commerce whose policies and practices amount to systematic destruction, and it is in this Passover Season, that these things are occurring, a time when Allah gave to Moses (Musa) the scriptures (Torah), which Al Qur'an acknowledges as a source of guidance for the Muhammad and the Muslims.



Qul Fa'tū Bikitābin Min `Indi Allāhi Huwa 'Ahdá Minhumā 'Attabi`hu 'In Kuntum Şādiqīna

  Say (unto them, O Muhammad): Then bring a scripture from the presence of Allah that giveth clearer guidance than these two (that) I may follow it, if ye are truthful.---

Sūrat Al-Qasas (28:49).

I can’t imagine Moses going to Pharaoh and begging Pharaoh to kill a part of the Hebrew people who differed over a schism from him, nor can I imagine Yahshua(Isa) going to Pilate and begging Pilate to kill the Pharisees and Sadducees because he was in disagreement with them?

How then does any Muslim Imam who is a scholar of Al Qur’an justify a Muslim community supporting the bombing of any other Muslims by the United States?

Instead of begging Mr. Trump to bomb Muslims, he should be supplicating to Allah for the destruction of the United States.

In keeping the Feast of Unleavened Bread, I as a Muslim accept that which was given to Moses as clear guidance, and in this time, I supplicate to Allah to destroy our oppressors and to lead my people out of captivity that we have suffered under for nearly 400 years.

Furthermore, because of my marriage to Nadrat Siddique, the youngest daughter of Dr. Siddique, I shall always be tied to Jamaat al Muslimeen by the FBI and Homeland Security, hence, as a member of the community; I disassociate myself with Dr. Siddique’s support of the murder by bombing of Syrian Muslims, by the United States.

There is a war being waged against Islam by the Western Nations, and that war has raged on for the last 1400 years, and it was because of the defeat of the Moors in 1490 that the Western nations were jettisoned into a position of worldwide military and economic dominance.

But in the same New Trend edition Dr. Siddique states the following in his editorial:


Dictators like Sissi and Bashar Assad, the Shias of Baghdad and the Kabul    regime use minorities like Christians, Yazeedis and Shias to bolster their     ruling cliques. Over time these groups have become alienated from majority         Muslim communities and continue to cooperate with oppressors.

 Islamic fighting groups are being hit hard by dictators and kings. They do not have the media to reach out globally and explain their viewpoints or heavy weapons needed to fight back. Even Al-Jazeera English could not survive in America although it made many concessions to American viewpoints.

 ISIS has AMAQ media but the US constantly tries to knock it off the air and to get its twitter accounts canceled.

 Most fighting groups are influenced by the words of Shaykh Osama bin Laden who said that if you hurt our people, we will hurt yours.

 My suggestion is that instead of constant retaliation, we should try communication, discussion and dialogue. Islam cannot be defeated, inshaAllah. This is not Germany or Japan. Islam is not territorial or racial. Only an estimated 5% or less of the global Muslim population is supporting the fighters. What should concern America is that the percentage is slowly but steadily going up, not down.

The future should be for mutual respect and acceptance of self-determination and not attempts at subjugation, deception and bombing. People of Mosul, Raqqa and Aleppo have not asked America or Russia to "liberate" them. Neither churches nor mosques-homes should be bombed.—SOURCE: New Trend Magazine Edition 1701.

There is a level of cognitive dissonance in the words and positions of Dr. Siddique, I won’t call him a hypocrite, but supporting the bombing of Syria by Donald Trump can certainly raise a reasonable inference that he is.

There are no Shia in power in Afganistan, they are a minority and when in 2011, Pakistani groups began a bombing campaign against the Shia in Afghanistan, the Taliban condemned the attacks as was reported by Interviewee: Brian Fishman, Counterterrorism Research Fellow, New America Foundation, Interviewer: Jayshree Bajoria, Deputy Editor, December 14, 2011 in the Council of Foreign Relations magazine called Foreign Affairs:


The Taliban condemned these attacks. Why?

The Taliban wants to be seen as a legitimate movement that can represent Afghans. Certainly we don't think of them in those terms, but that's how the traditional Taliban leadership conceives of themselves, as an organization that has a claim to a leadership role in Afghanistan. [This attack] was clearly aimed at civilians -- even if it as aimed at a sect that is despised by many members of the Taliban, it was still aimed at Afghans--and the Taliban wants to maintain their ability to have a claim on control on all of Afghanistan. An attack like this doesn't accord with that, so that is why they have condemned the attack, and will probably do so in the future.—Source:

So contrary to Dr. Siddique’s analysis, the Shia aren’t in power in Afghanistan, but Donald Trump bombed Sunni and Shia alike with the “Mother of All Bombs”, and I wonder if this gave some sort of weird orgasmic satisfaction to Dr. Siddique.

This is of concern to me again, because Masjid Jamaat al Muslimeen is attended by mostly African-Americans, it is located in the Wilson Park/Govans area of northeast Baltimore, and is attended by some of my childhood, teen and early adulthood friends and acquaintances from that area, that I grew up in.

Many of the follow Dr. Siddique without any critical examination of his teachings and positons, many of which are based in what is called “Sunnah” or Hadiths, for which there is no direct authority for in Al Qur’an.

There was never a time when I would’ve followed Dr. Siddique without question, in fact, I questioned everything he taught, including his reliance on hadith, which I refuse to acknowledge as essential to being a Muslim, hence, I’m called a hadith rejecter, but on that score, Dr. Siddique and many hadithist reject what was revealed to Moses in contradistinction to what is clearly written in Sūrat Al-Qasas (28:49) of Al Qur’an.

So, during this Festival of Unleavened Bread, which is incumbent on even us Muslims, I supplicate to Allah (Yvhh Alahim, and Aloh for my Hebrew, and Aramaic speaking People of the Book) to defeat and destroy the United States and to wipe it from the pages of time for its crimes against the children of Ysrael, who are called “Black, “Colored”, “Negro” and “African-American” by the government and media of the United States.

May there be a uniting of Asia and the houses and clans of all the seed of Ibrahim, and the People of the Book, and may those who have stolen our identities and traditions be brought low and made to be our footstool.

To Dr. Siddique and all immigrant Muslims, and so-called African-American Muslims who have joined on with the oppressive government of the United States, you cannot serve two masters,  it causes cognitive dissonance, you appear to be hypocrites, and you shall be destroyed with those who seek to force their unjust system of government and commerce on the whole of the planet.

I leave you all with my favorite quote from Samuel P. Huntington’s A Clash of Civilizations:

“The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.” ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order.

© 2017 David Anthony Wiggins©, All rights reserved
David Wiggins

The Vatican Discovery Doctrine, United States Supreme Court and Garveyland Independence

In 1823, the Vatican Discovery Doctrine was overtly adopted as legal precedence by the Supreme Court in Johnson v. McIntosh, 21 U.S. (8 Wheat.) 543

Then Chief Justice John Marshall, writing the unanimous decision of the court observed that Christian European nations had assumed "ultimate dominion" over the lands of North America during the so-called "Age of Discovery", and that - upon "discovery", that the Native Inhabitants-- had lost "their rights to complete sovereignty, as independent nations," but recognized natives retained a right of "occupancy" in their lands.

Consequently, Natives are now subjected to the sole authority of the first nation of Christendom to claim possession of any native lands.

The Syllabus reads as follows:

"A title to lands under grants to private individuals made by Indian tribes or nations northwest of the River Ohio in 1773 and 1775 cannot be recognized in the courts of the United States.

Discovery the original foundation of titles to land on the American continent as between the different European nations by whom conquests and settlements were made here.

Recognition of the same principle in the wars, negotiations, and treaties between the different European powers.

Adoption of the same principle by the United States.

The exclusive right of the British government to the lands occupied by the Indians has passed to that of the United States.

Foundation and limitation of the right of conquest.

Application of the principle of the right of conquest to the case of the Indian savages. Nature of the Indian title, as subordinate to the absolute ultimate title of the government."----21 U.S. (8 Wheat.) 543

Marshall went on further to opine for the court:

"1st. That on 23 May, 1609, James I, King of England, by his letters patent of that date, under the great seal of England, did erect, form, and establish Robert, Earl of Salisbury, and others, his associates, in the letters patent named and their successors into a body corporate and politic by the name and style of "The Treasurer and Company of Adventurers and Planters of the City of London for the first Colony in Virginia," with perpetual succession and power to make, have, and use a common seal, and did give, grant, and confirm unto this company, and their successors,"

Page 21 U. S. 544

By what and whose authority did King James grant a charter to lands, to his commercial company of "Adventurers" (read: thieves, robbers, looters and killers), well reading further we find the answer to the question:

"On the discovery of this immense continent, the great nations of Europe were eager to appropriate to themselves so much of it as they could respectively acquire. Its vast extent offered an

Page 21 U. S. 573

ample field to the ambition and enterprise of all, and the character and religion of its inhabitants afforded an apology for considering them as a people over whom the superior genius of Europe might claim an ascendency.

The potentates of the old world found no difficulty in convincing themselves that they made ample compensation to the inhabitants of the new by bestowing on them civilization and Christianity in exchange for unlimited independence.
But as they were all in pursuit of nearly the same object, it was necessary, in order to avoid conflicting settlements and consequent war with each other, to establish a principle which all should acknowledge as the law by which the right of acquisition, which they all asserted should be regulated as between themselves.
This principle was that discovery gave title to the government by whose subjects or by whose authority it was made against all other European governments, which title might be consummated by possession.

The exclusion of all other Europeans necessarily gave to the nation making the discovery the sole right of acquiring the soil from the natives and establishing settlements upon it. It was a right with which no Europeans could interfere. It was a right which all asserted for themselves, and to the assertion of which by others all assented"--Page 21 U. S. 574

What people in their right mind would give their land, their heritage and sovereignty over to a nation of brigands, thieves and murders, to be made homeless beggars in the land of their forefathers given to them by virtue of birth and the will of a beneficent creator?

The lands were stolen through a war of conquest waged against the natives by the Kings of Europe who were placed on their respective thrones by the Pope who controlled the Vatican of their day, hence Marshall goes on to explain:

"While the different nations of Europe respected the right of the natives as occupants, they asserted the ultimate dominion to be in themselves, and claimed and exercised, as a consequence of this ultimate dominion, a power to grant the soil while yet in possession of the natives. These grants have been understood by all to convey a title to the grantees, subject only to the Indian right of occupancy.

The history of America from its discovery to the present day proves, we think, the universal recognition of these principles.

Spain did not rest her title solely on the grant of the Pope. Her discussions respecting boundary, with France, with Great Britain, and with the United States all show that she placed in on the rights given by discovery. Portugal sustained her claim to the Brazils by the same title.

France also founded her title to the vast territories she claimed in America on discovery. However

Page 21 U. S. 575

conciliatory her conduct to the natives may have been, she still asserted her right of dominion over a great extent of country not actually settled by Frenchmen and her exclusive right to acquire and dispose of the soil which remained in the occupation of Indians. Her monarch claimed all Canada and Acadie as colonies of France at a time when the French population was very inconsiderable and the Indians occupied almost the whole country. He also claimed Louisiana, comprehending the immense territories watered by the Mississippi and the rivers which empty into it, by the title of discovery.

Marshall continues to explain the various patents which were purportedly granted and to whom by “European Potentates”, who had no authority over the natives of this land:

The letters patent granted to the Sieur Demonts in 1603, constitute him Lieutenant General, and the representative of the King in Acadie, which is described as stretching from the 40th to the 46th degree of north latitude, with authority to extend the power of the French over that country and its inhabitants, to give laws to the people, to treat with the natives and enforce the observance of treaties, and to parcel out and give title to lands according to his own judgment.

The states of Holland also made acquisitions in America and sustained their right on the common principle adopted by all Europe. They allege, as we are told by Smith in his History of New York, that Henry Hudson, who sailed, as they say, under the orders of their East India Company, discovered the country from the Delaware to the Hudson, up which he sailed to the 43d degree of north latitude, and this country they claimed under the title acquired by this voyage.

Page 21 U. S. 576

Why is this important to the inhabitants of Tubman City Garveyland???

I intentionally skipped over some pages of the decision to answer the first question as it was contained on the decision and not the history this was necessary to validate the claims of the People of Tubman City, Garveyland, who have declared their Independence and Sovereignty from the Vatican, the United States, and the State of Maryland all who claim authority, control, and power of the lands further described in the background of the case:

"4th. That in the year 1624, this corporation was dissolved by due course of law and all its powers, together with its rights of soil and jurisdiction under the letters patent in question were revested in the Crown of England, whereupon the colony became a royal government with the same territorial limits and extent which had been established by the letters patent, and so continued until it became a free and independent state, except so far as its limits and extent were altered and curtailed by the Treaty of February 10, 1763, between Great Britain and France and by the letters patent granted by the King of England

Page 21 U. S. 546

for establishing the Colonies of Carolina, Maryland, and Pennsylvania.

5th. That sometime previous to the year 1756, the French government, laying a claim to the country west of the Alleghany or Appalachian Mountains on the Ohio and Mississippi Rivers and their branches, took possession of certain parts of it with the consent of the several tribes or nations of Indians possessing and owning them, and with the like consent established several military posts and settlements therein, particularly at Kaskaskias, on the River Kaskaskias, and at Vincennes, on the River Wabash, within the limits of the Colony of Virginia, as described and established in and by the letters patent of May 23, 1609, and that the government of Great Britain, after complaining of these establishments as encroachments and remonstrating against them, at length, in the year 1756, took up arms to resist and repel them, which produced a war between those two nations wherein the Indian tribes inhabiting and holding the countries northwest of the Ohio and on the Mississippi above the mouth of the Ohio were the allies of France, and the Indians known by the name of the Six Nations or the Iroquois and their tributaries and allies were the allies of Great Britain, and that on 10 February, 1763, this war was terminated by a definitive treaty of peace between Great Britain and France and their allies by which it was stipulated and agreed that the River Mississippi, from its source to the Iberville, should forever after form the boundary between the dominions of

Page 21 U. S. 547

Great Britain and those of France in that part of North America and between their respective allies there.

6th. That the government of Virginia, at and before the commencement of this war and at all times after it became a royal government, claimed and exercised jurisdiction, with the knowledge and assent of the government of Great Britain, in and over the country northwest of the River Ohio and east of the Mississippi as being included within the bounds and limits described and established for that colony, by the letters patent of May 23, 1609, and that in the year 1749, a grant of six hundred thousand acres of land within the country northwest of the Ohio and as part of Virginia was made by the government of Great Britain to some of its subjects by the name and style of the Ohio Company.

7th. That at and before the commencement of the war in 1756 and during its whole continuance and at the time of the Treaty of February 10, 1763, the Indian tribes or nations inhabiting the country north and northwest of the Ohio and east of the Mississippi as far east as the river falling into the Ohio called the Great Miami were called and known by the name of the Western Confederacy of Indians, and were the allies of France in the war, but not her subjects, never having been in any manner conquered by her, and held the country in absolute sovereignty as independent nations, both as to the right of jurisdiction and sovereignty and the right of soil, except a few military posts and a small territory around each,

Page 21 U. S. 548

which they had ceded to France, and she held under them, and among which were the aforesaid posts of Kaskaskias and Vincennes, and that these Indians, after the treaty, became the allies of Great Britain, living under her protection as they had before lived under that of France, but were free and independent, owing no allegiance to any foreign power whatever and holding their lands in absolute property, the territories of the respective tribes being separated from each other and distinguished by certain natural marks and boundaries to the Indians well known, and each tribe claiming and exercising separate and absolute ownership in and over its own territory, both as to the right of sovereignty and jurisdiction and the right of soil.

8th. That among the tribes of Indians thus holding and inhabiting the territory north and northwest of the Ohio, east of the Mississippi, and west of the Great Miami, within the limits of Virginia, as described in the letters patent of May 23, 1609, were certain independent tribes or nations called the Illinois or Kaskaskias and the Piankeshaw or Wabash Indians, the first of which consisted of three several tribes united into one and called the Kaskasias, the Pewarias, and the Cahoquias; that the Illinois owned, held, and inhabited, as their absolute and separate property, a large tract of country within the last mentioned limits and situated on the Mississippi, Illinois, and Kaskaskias Rivers and on the Ohio below the mouth of the Wabash, and the Piankeshaws another large tract of country within the same

Page 21 U. S. 549

limits, and as their absolute and separate property, on the Wabash and Ohio Rivers, and that these Indians remained in the sole and absolute ownership and possession of the country in question until the sales made by them in the manner herein after set forth.

9th. That on the termination of the war between Great Britain and France, the Illinois Indians, by the name of the Kaskaskias tribes of Indians, as fully representing all the Illinois tribes then remaining, made a treaty of peace with Great Britain and a treaty of peace, limits, and amity, under her mediation, with the Six Nations, or Iroquois, and their allies, then known and distinguished by the name of the Northern Confederacy of Indians, the Illinois being a part of the confederacy then known and distinguished by the name of the Southern Confederacy, and sometimes by that of the Western Confederacy.

10th. That on 7 October, 1763, the King of Great Britain made and published a proclamation for the better regulation of the countries ceded to Great Britain by that treaty, which proclamation is referred to and made part of the case.

11th. That from time immemorial and always up to the present time, all the Indian tribes or nations of North America, and especially the Illinois and Piankeshaws and other tribes holding, possessing, and inhabiting the said countries north and northeast of the Ohio east of the Mississippi and west of the Great Miami held their respective lands and territories each in common, the individuals

Page 21 U. S. 550

of each tribe or nation holding the lands and territories of such tribe in common with each other, and there being among them no separate property in the soil, and that their sole method of selling, granting, and conveying their lands, whether to governments or individuals, always has been from time immemorial and now is for certain chiefs of the tribe selling to represent the whole tribe in every part of the transaction, to make the contract, and execute the deed, on behalf of the whole tribe, to receive for it the consideration, whether in money or commodities, or both, and finally to divide such consideration among the individuals of the tribe, and that the authority of the chiefs so acting for the whole tribe is attested by the presence and assent of the individuals composing the tribe, or some of them, and by the receipt by the individuals composing the tribe of their respective shares of the price, and in no other manner.

12th. That on 5 July, 1773, certain chiefs of the Illinois Indians, then jointly representing, acting for, and being duly authorized by that tribe in the manner explained above, did by their deed poll, duly executed and delivered and bearing date on that day, at the post of Kaskaskias, then being a British military post, and at a public council there held by them for and on behalf of the said Illinois nation of Indians withWilliam Murray, of the Illinois country, merchant, acting for himself and for Moses Franks and Jacob Franks, of London, in Great Britain, David Franks, John Inglis, Bernard Gratz, Michael

Page 21 U. S. 551

Gratz, Alexander Ross, David Sproat, and James Milligan, all of Philadelphia, in the p\Province of Pennsylvania; Moses Franks, Andrew Hamilton, William Hamilton, and Edmund Milne of the same place; Joseph Simons otherwise called Joseph Simon and Levi Andrew Levi of the Town of Lancaster in Pennsylvania; Thomas Minshall of York County in the same province; Robert Callender and William Thompson, of Cumberland County in the same province; John Campbell of Pittsburgh in the same province; and George Castles and James Ramsay of the Illinois country, and for a good and valuable consideration in the said deed stated grant, bargain, sell, alien, lease, enfeoff, and confirm to the said William Murray, Moses Franks, Jacob Franks, David Franks, John Inglis, Bernard Gratz, Michael Gratz, Alexander Ross, David Sproat, James Milligan, Andrew Hamilton, William Hamilton, Edmund Milne Joseph Simons, otherwise called Joseph Simon Levi Andrew Levi, Thomas Minshall, Robert Callender, William Thompson, John Campbell, George Castles, and James Ramsay, their heirs and assigns forever, in severalty, or to George the Third, then King of Great Britain and Ireland, his heirs and successors, for the use, benefit, and behoof of the grantees, their heirs and assigns, in severalty, by whichever of those tenures they might most legally hold, all those two several tracts or parcels of land situated, lying, and being within the limits of Virginia on the east of the Mississippi, northwest of the Ohio, and west of the Great Miami, and thus butted.”--Page 21 U. S. 552

The whites that came to the Americas had no authority, nor can those in authority, control and power of the Corporate Bodi Politics known as the United States, the State of Maryland, the State of Virginia, the State of Illinois, or any other fictitious juristic commercial entity can produce a valid deed or contract from any so-called “chiefs” who had the signatures and authorities of all the native population to deed over the land of America over to representatives of European kings commercial corporations.

Even in following their own doctrine of the law of contracts no chief could sign over a peoples inheritance, without each individuals consent and signature.

Let’s revisit this statement written by Marshall : “This principle was that discovery gave title to the government by whose subjects or by whose authority it was made against all other European governments, which title might be consummated by possession.”

A court of 9 white men came together in Washington, D.C. to validate the land theft of America through legal sophistry, and enslaved not just the native inhabitants of North America through Papal Bulls such as Inter Caetera Divina of Vatican in 1493, and it is important for the People of Tubman City to note that, these legal fallacies have no jurisdiction over our daily lives and we need but disassociate ourselves from the legal fictions of our captors and tormentor having already claimed our independence from fraudulent actions of a pretended corporate body politic established by King James I of England, and his lawyers.

We have no contract with the Pope, we have no contract with King James, we have no contract with the United States or the State of Maryland or any other fictitious legal entities that exist on paper, and in recognizing this, we must recognize all those who purport to enforce the laws of these fictitious entities as war criminals without any authority over our liberty, our Souls and or our possessions.

Whereas, at the time of the defeat of our forefathers at Grenada in 1492, and the establishment of the rule of the Holy Roman Empire in Europe, and,

Whereas, In the Intera Cetera Divina bull of 1452, Pope Nicholas directed King Alfonso to "capture, vanquish, and subdue the saracens, pagans, and other enemies of Christ," to "put them into perpetual slavery," and "to take all their possessions and property.", and,

Whereas, the same US Supreme Court has recognized that:

"Congress can exercise no power by virtue of any supposed inherent sovereignty in the General Government. Indeed, it may be doubted whether the power can be correctly said to appertain to sovereignty in any proper sense as an attribute of an independent political community. The power to commit violence, perpetrate injustice, take private property by force without compensation to the owner, and compel the receipt of promises to pay in place of money, may be exercised, as it often has been, by irresponsible authority, but it cannot be considered as belonging to a government founded upon law. But be that as it may, there is no such thing as a power of inherent sovereignty in the Government of the United States." --Juilliard v. Greenman, (1884) 110 U.S. 421.;

Whereas; We, as a People are being brutalized and subjected to extrajudicial murder and other crimes being committed against us, under color of law, by those who have sworn an oath to "uphold and defend the Constitution". Genocidal polices that result in the aforementioned crimes, are enacted, executed and enforced by those in the executive, legislative and judicial branches of government, who also have sworn an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution, and yet it is these very individuals who are ultimately to be held accountable for committing Open Air Genocide against us as a people.

Whereas; The United States on its Federal, State, and Local levels of those who have sworn an oath to "uphold and defend the Constitution", each individual, who has done so, and who has allowed to continue the "Deprivations of Civil Rights Under Color of Law". The Department of Justice has reported extensively on Baltimore, Cleveland, Oakland, Ferguson, and other governmental subdivisions of the United States, under the "Authority, Control, and Power" of ALL of those individuals, who have sworn an oath to "uphold and defend the Constitution" are guilty of violating the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide. This is not very difficult to understand, this is not overly legalistic, it is a plain fact that exist at law, and most importantly within the jurisdiction of International Law, which the United States is signatory to.

Whereas; This goes far beyond Civil Rights and even "Human Rights", it goes to the very essence of our Divine Natural Right to stand as men and separate ourselves from a despotic class of individuals, all of whom, have sworn to "uphold and defend the Constitution", and who have written numerous reports of their deliberate and systematic policies to violate the very Constitution that they have all sworn to "uphold and defend".

Whereas;  We Question: Where are “Black Lawyers for Justice” on this issue, are they not officers of the Courts who have sworn to "uphold and defend the Constitution"? How about Black Judges, Black Elected Officials? How about Black Commission Seat Holders? How about Black Central Committee Seat Holders? Black Election Board Seat Holders, Black Court Clerks? And; what about Blacks in Law Enforcement? And, Blacks in the Military?

Whereas; Now that you see what we're up against from those within our own race who have sworn an oath to "uphold and defend the constitution", but who go along with their superiors in subverting the Constitution and denying Justice to the victims of those their genocidal polices are destroying.

Whereas; The time has come for us to remove our plight from the jurisdiction of those who have sworn to uphold and defend the Constitution to the United Nations, and charge the United States on the all of its levels of government with Genocide and the Destruction of Black People in North America. Citizenship cannot be forced on us; we cannot be forced into the jurisdiction of a governing class of outlaws, thieves and murderers.

Whereas;The time has come to Separate from those who are committing Genocide against us, and any Politician, Preacher, Entertainers, Lawyers, Athletes, Physicians, Professors, Historians, and Pundits, who disagree are complicit with the genocide.

Whereas; You all have an individual responsibility to disassociate from forced/ coerced citizenship and contact the International Community for assistance in charging all those who have sworn an oath to "uphold and defend the Constitution" with the crime of GENOCIDE and violations of the Convention for the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide.

Whereas; There is no Divine or mortal authority which can validate the United States Supreme Court adoption of the so-called Vatican Doctrine of Discovery to the People or the land of America for the sole purpose of the continued implementation of slavery of the Aboriginal People of the earth, we the People of Tubman City must call our own conventions to free governance separate and independent from a government based in fraud, murder, theft and slavery.


©2017 David Anthony Wiggins©, All rights reserved

Maurice Ashby

Man’s law

The media is usually in a drunken frenzy over legislation by CONgress because modem man believes that the nation’s salvation depends on what happens in Washington. Humanistic law originates with man who believes that man is the measure of all things. Humanists believe laws can save society; that morality is the fruit of legislation; that man-made law can shape and “change” men; that law can produce the “Great Society.” And, most politically active Christians believe the same—right law can change America.

When president-elect BarackObama promised “change” the crowds cheered with a frenzy. Hope for change had arrived in history. Why, because humanists believe that new laws can usher in a brave new world, a new age, a new hope for mankind; that the state can reform men; that the state can control man’s behavior by passing more statutes to regulate what men eat, think, do, and say. In essence, legislation not only produces the desired morality of humanists but salvation through the medium of law. Modem man believes, “If we just pass more laws, we can make America perfect!!” Humanistic law seeks the salvation of mankind and the remaking of society. For humanists, salvation is an act of the STATE. Paradise is created by government. President Barak Obama reflects this view when he stated circa July 16, 2010, “My fate . . . my salvation is not going to come about without collective salvation”; that is, saving of society through legal reform.

God’s law

The Biblical law model rejects the false hope that legalism leads to the salvation of society. The Ten Commandments originates with the “LORD thy God who brought thee out of Egypt” wherein God’s character is the measure of all things (Ps. ll9:l37). Because American law generated from Biblical faith, early American law did not try to save men or create the “great society” or “a brave new world” or “eliminate poverty” or usher in “world peace.” To the Biblical mind, any trust in Washington is idolatry. Put not your “trust in princes,” warns the Scripture (Ps. 118:9). Biblical law existed to protect law- keepers and to punish law-breakers. While the enforcement of Biblical law can restrain sinners, it cannot change and transform them. Salvation is not connected to law but to true religion. The gospel of Christ is not about how God’s law can save society, but how Christ redeems sinners through His work on the cross. Law is good and proper in its place, but law cannot remake society. The basic purpose of law is to restrain, not regenerate.

Can We Legislate Morality?

When confronted with Christian law, the liberal politician presents his counterclaim, "You can't legislate morality." Hoping to kill the reform, the politician then accuses the sponsor of the bill of trying to force his morality on Americans. "You can't legislate morality" is a dangerous half-truth, even a lie because ALL legislation represents somebody's morality. All legislation is concerned with somebody's morality. Laws against stealing and murder and slander represent morality in the Ten Commandments: thou shall not steal or thou shall not murder or thou shall not bear false witness. Law is the science of good and evil. All law is concerned about morality. The issue is not whether law represents morality but "Who's morality is going to rule in society—the morality of the womanizer or the law of the family man; the law of the lesbian or the law of the straight woman; the law the energetic business man or the law of the welfare recipient; the law of American worker or the law of the Big Bankers?

There are different kinds of morality: there is the law of the Moslem and there is the law of the Christian; there is the law of the Hindu, Buddhist, Humanist, atheist, and humanist. Which will rule society? Since all law has a religious foundation, the question is "Who religion is going to rule society?" Currently, Moslems have been successful in forcing Sharia food laws on restaurants in Minnesota. Mexico has been effective in influencing the administration to liberalize laws against illegal aliens.

President Obama has succeeded in enacting his socialistic, heath care values on Americans. Laws reflect morality, and during this season in history, the religious values of liberal socialists prevail. Law and order in America is deteriorating because Christians are antinomian in their faith and because the religion of humanism pervades society. Biblical foundations are denied by the courts in preference for the tyrannical laws of reigning humanist legislators. Christian law is viewed as oppressive, even criminal, because Christian law forbids adultery, murder, fornication, false advertising, homosexuality, abortion, and fraud—something humanists promote in the name of "freedom"or "change." "You can't legislate morality" is a misnomer at best and a complete lie at the most. Keep in mind that every time that legislators are in session, some representative is seeking to force his or her religious values on the rest of by legislating his or her morality. When Christian law rules freedom and truth and justice prevail; when humanistic law or Sharia law rules, moral perversion and tyranny and death prevail.

- Laws Of The Bible Copyright SovereigntyEducation And Defense Ministry

After reading this, Do you now question what the actual solution is to overcome what we are witnessing on this land they call the U.S Government?

Do you now question all the Federal/State/City officials, lawyer's, activist, non profits, grass roots organizations, corporations, pastors/bishops/popes that are purposefully gate-keeping the spiritual truth from you?

If not.. You should be NOW... - A Sound Mind

2 Timothy 1:7

For God has not given us a spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and a sound mind.

Maurice Ashby Aug 4 '16 · Rate: 5